Food & Agriculture Litigation
From bet-the-company patent defenses to complex regulatory battles, Downey Brand’s litigators have protected clients in California’s food and agriculture industry for decades, providing experienced counsel and advocacy when it matters most.
Downey Brand’s food and agriculture litigation team has represented clients from every sector of California’s agricultural industry, including farmers, dairies, wineries, processors, distributors, PCAs, aerial applicators, grocers, and industry trade associations. Clients include both plaintiffs and defendants, and range from individuals to large corporations. Our attorneys have represented clients in state and federal court, as well as in mediations, arbitrations, and administrative hearings. The attorneys in our food and agriculture litigation practice have extensive experience in California agribusiness and are deeply knowledgeable about the important issues facing the industry.
Commercial Disputes
Downey Brand litigators represent growers when buyers of their crops fail to pay on time (PACA and California Producers’ Liens). They also provide representation and counseling in commercial disputes over contracts, leases, and land acquisitions.
Pesticide Drift Litigation
Our litigators have represented growers whose crops have been damaged by drift to recover damages, and have also defended farmers and pesticide applicators who are accused of responsibility for pesticide drift. Downey Brand attorneys offer counseling to farmers, PCAs, and applicators to help them develop safeguards to minimize their risk of facing litigation and liability for pesticide drift.
Food Labeling Litigation
Gaps in the Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory frameworks have fostered a dramatic increase in food labeling litigation over the past decade. Experienced with this rapidly changing legal environment, Downey Brand attorneys counsel clients in the food and agriculture industry to minimize their risk of facing adverse legal action. And when necessary, our litigators defend food manufacturers and grocers in court from class action suits and regulatory scrutiny for alleged violations of food labeling standards.
Prop. 65 Violation Defense
Proposition 65 bars businesses from exposing customers to chemicals “known to the state to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity” without providing “clear and reasonable” warnings. Our attorneys help food manufacturers, processors, and grocers interpret their obligations under Prop. 65’s ever-changing regulatory framework and respond appropriately to notices of violation. In addition to assisting with compliance and risk management before a violation is alleged, our attorneys have defended clients in the food and agriculture industry in high-stakes Prop. 65 litigation.
Intellectual Property / Patent Litigation
The patent litigation team at Downey Brand has protected the trade secrets, technology, trademarks, and other intellectual property of companies across the agribusiness industry, from farmers and wineries to food processors and grocers.
Grocery Store Credit Card Surcharge Litigation
A recent decision in the Ninth Circuit permitted a grocer to apply credit card surcharges to purchases as a percentage of their total price. This decision, though narrow in scope, may permit other grocers and food retailers to apply credit card surcharges to their customers’ purchases. Our attorneys can guide businesses currently subject to California’s prohibition of credit card surcharges through the process of seeking relief from this law under this new Ninth Circuit precedent.
Selected Experience
- Successfully represented a buyer of a walnut orchard in a fraud action against the seller who concealed the existence of disease in the orchard.
- Served as co-counsel representing the California Association of Egg Farmers involving legal and regulatory issues pertaining to statutes imposing size dimensions on egg-laying hen enclosures.
- Represented one of the nation’s leading dried fruit processors in an action alleging infringement of various food processing patents. Obtained favorable claim constructions of key patent claim terms, which provided the foundation for the granting of summary judgment on all claims. Ultimately, after the case returned to the district court following appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the action settled on extremely favorable terms for client.
Trade Groups
- Bard Valley Date Growers Association
- California Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers Association
- California Association of Wine Grape Growers
- California Association of Pest Control Advisers
- California League of Food Producers
- California Grocers Association
- CGA Educational Foundation
- California Manufacturers & Technology Association
- California Grain & Feed Association
- California Olive Association
- California Wine Education Foundation
- Frozen & Refrigerated Food Council of Northern California
- Grocer’s Research and Education Foundation
- The Illuminators (an association of grocery industry suppliers)
- Illuminators Educational Foundation
- Napa Valley Grapegrowers
- National Grocers Association
- Northern California Water Association
- Pest Control Operators of California
- Stanley W. Strew Foundation
- Western Growers Association
- Successfully represented a buyer of a walnut orchard in a fraud action against the seller who concealed the existence of disease in the orchard.
- Served as co-counsel representing the California Association of Egg Farmers involving legal and regulatory issues pertaining to statutes imposing size dimensions on egg-laying hen enclosures.
- Represented one of the nation’s leading dried fruit processors in an action alleging infringement of various food processing patents. Obtained favorable claim constructions of key patent claim terms, which provided the foundation for the granting of summary judgment on all claims. Ultimately, after the case returned to the district court following appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the action settled on extremely favorable terms for client.
- Represented the owner and licensor of a patented method and apparatus (and associated trade secrets and know-how) used in California’s tomato processing industry for the past fifteen years. Matters have included the handling of contested claims of patent infringement and various license disputes. Through our strategic efforts, we have successfully secured millions of dollars in royalties over the past decade. We helped steer our client through a challenge to its patent via a reexamination proceeding initiated by a licensee, and emerged with a patent stronger than it had been. We also represented our client in an Inter Partes Review (IPR) challenge to its patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark office, obtaining a complete victory.
- Represented several agriculture industry trade associations in blocking implementation and enforcement of unfavorable laws and regulations.
- Obtained a judgment in excess of $450,000 against an almond growing company that failed to pay for its irrigation system and claimed damages for the death of its almond orchard.
- Represented dozens of winegrape growers in recovering payments from defaulting wineries.
- Successfully defended aerial applicators throughout the Central Valley against claims of negligence and strict liability relating to the application of agricultural chemicals.
- Represented numerous growers of winegrapes, blueberries, and other crops in settling and recovering after trial millions of dollars in damages arising from pesticide drift.
- Represented large dairy processor in a major wastewater discharge dispute with the Regional Water Board.
- Represented a group of more than 20 farmers in a stream adjudication of more than 2,000 parties involving riparian, appropriative, and groundwater issues.
- Represented a vineyard in Sonoma County in connection with its application for rights to water in streams flowing through the property.
- Advised and represented regional grocery store chain in multiple Proposition 65 claims for alleged failure to warn in conjunction with sale of products.
- Served as co-counsel in successfully defending a national food company against Proposition 65 and unfair competition claims.
Sean J. Filippini
Partner
Sacramento 916.520.5430
John C. McCarron
Partner
Sacramento 916.520.5450
Rebecca R. A. Smith
Partner
Sacramento 916.520.5281
Robert P. Soran
Partner
Sacramento 916.520.5364
M. Max Steinheimer
Of Counsel
Stockton 209.472.3926
Sacramento 916.444.1000
Announcements
7 related items-
August 25, 2021Distinguished Trial Attorney Kevin Rooney Joins Downey Brand as Counsel
-
January 15, 2020Downey Brand Names Two New Partners
-
July 1, 2019Downey Brand Welcomes New Counsel Kelly Breen
-
January 12, 2018Prominent Attorney James Morris Joins Downey Brand
-
December 20, 2017Downey Brand Promotes Four New Counsel
-
December 12, 2017Downey Brand Names Six New Partners
-
January 6, 2017Downey Brand Names New Partners and Counsel
In the News
3 related items-
June 15, 2018Table of Experts: The Business of Agriculture
Sacramento Business Journal -
June 26, 2014Pain of California’s Water Shortage is Spreading
The Sacramento Bee -
February 2, 2014Family Farms: How to Pass On – or Sell Off – the Family Business
The Sacramento Bee
Speaking Engagements / Events
4 related items-
February 4, 2021Contract Negotiations, Grape Brokers, Land Value Trends & Financing Solutions
Mendocino Winegrowers, Economic Summit 2021 -
February 6, 2019Pesticide Drift: Compliance, Liability, and Protection
Co-presenter, 10th Annual Spray Safe Program -
March 28, 2018Pesticide Drift: Compliance, Liability, and Protection
Co-presenter, Yuba-Sutter Farm Bureau -
June 25, 2015Trends in Legislation and Constitutional Challenges
Co-presenter, The State Bar of California, Agricultural Law Conference
Legal Alerts
16 related items-
August 31, 2020FDA Announces Three-Year Phase-Out of PFAS Used in Food Packaging; FDA Studies Indicate Non-Detectable Levels of PFAS in General Food Supply
Food and Agriculture Law -
May 22, 2020Farmers Affected by COVID-19 May Seek Economic Relief from the Department of Agriculture’s Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP)
Downey Brand COVID-19 News and UpdatesFood and Agriculture Law -
April 21, 2020OEHHA’s Proposed “Clarifications” to Proposition 65 Clear and Reasonable Warning Regulations Actually Represent a Significant Change
Environmental Law -
November 2, 2018OEHHA Proposes Amendments to Prop. 65 Reproductive Toxicity Sampling Requirements for Food Products; New Prop. 65 Regulations for PFAS Take Effect November 10, 2018
Environmental Law -
June 19, 2018U.S. District Court Denies California Attorney General’s Request to Reconsider Holding that Proposition 65 Warnings for Glyphosate in Herbicide Products are Misleading
Environmental Law -
June 18, 2018California Proposes Regulation that Proposition 65 Cancer Warnings Are Not Required for Coffee
Environmental Law -
April 4, 2018Tentative Ruling Could Mean You Have to Give A Prop 65 Warning for Every Cup of Coffee You Sell or Give to Consumers
Environmental Law -
November 6, 2017New Proposition 65 Clear and Reasonable Warning Regulations Are Effective in 2018
Environmental Law -
October 12, 2017California Enacts Legislation in an Attempt to Level the Playing Field in Proposition 65 Enforcement Actions
Environmental Law -
May 10, 2017California Supreme Court Clarifies Day of Rest Rules
Employment Law -
May 2, 2017FDA Extends Compliance Deadline For Menu Nutrition Labeling
Food and Agriculture Law -
June 16, 2016FDA Issues Final Rule Under Food Safety Modernization Act
Food and Agriculture Law -
February 25, 2016ICE Traffic Stops – Now What?
Food and Agriculture Law -
May 23, 2014Farm Lenders and Farming Organizations File Amicus Brief in Crucial Ninth Circuit Water Case
Food and Agriculture Law -
May 13, 2013United States Supreme Court Rules for Monsanto in Roundup Ready Patent Case
Food and Agriculture Law -
March 2013Courts Grapple with California Law Requiring Employers to Provide Employees with “Suitable Seating”
Employment Law
Publications
10 related items-
March 2020Update: Signature Gatherers and Solicitors
California Grocer, Issue 1 -
October 2017The “Wild West” of ADA Website Litigation
California Grocer, Issue 4 -
July/August 2017Cause for Concern Over Organic Fertilizer Made from Food Waste?
Western Grower & Shipper -
June 2017Protecting Intellectual Property Rights
California Grocer, Issue 3 -
February 2016Is Your Insurance Company Really On Your Side?
California Grocer, Issue 1 -
November 2015Urgency Legislation Helps Curb Frivolous PAGA Lawsuits
California Grocer, Issue 6 -
September 2015Failure to Follow WIC Stocking Requirements Can Endanger Your Program Status
California Grocer, Issue 4 -
May 2015Proposed Prop. 65 Regs Equal Less Help and More Hurt (and Litigation)
California Grocer, Issue 2 -
February 4, 2014California Court Rules Consumers Cannot Privately Sue To Enforce Organic Food Labeling Laws
California League of Food Processors’ Newsletter -
October 2013A New Twist of False Advertising Lawsuits
California Grocer, Issue 5